Abstract
The rise of many-analysts studies has underscored substantial variability in research outcomes when different teams independently analyze identical data sets and hypotheses. This paper demonstrates how the many-analysts framework can be effectively integrated into research methods education. We propose a pedagogical approach in which multiple students independently analyze the same research question using identical datasets in their term papers, followed by a meta-analysis of their collective results. This instructional method highlights critical methodological concepts, such as researcher degrees of freedom and epistemic humility. Moreover, this study applies the many-analysts approach specifically to causal inference using observational data with difference-in-differences analyses. The analyses conducted by students revealed a broad range of effect sizes and led to divergent conclusions, thus emphasizing the educational and methodological value of robustness checks involving multiple independent analysts. These findings illustrate how integrating a many-analysts framework in teaching can enhance students’ methodological rigor and appreciation of empirical uncertainty.